As of now, artificial intelligence (AI) is widely known to be very good at learning and carrying out specific tasks. For instance, it can be used for facial recognition, identification of objects, reading and understanding text, and so on. But can AI actually create or invent something?

The answer is not a simple yes or no. There are different opinions on this matter. Some experts believe that AI is capable of creating new things, while others think that AI can only imitate what already exists.

As the innovation paradigm in the automotive industry shifted over time, artificial intelligence (“AI”) has deeply penetrated into the operation of the automotive industry. For example, the integration of AI in automotive availed a broad range of consumer-friendly functions previously not navigated in the automotive industry, such as autonomous driving, battery management, and speech recognition. Some manufacturers seek to utilize robots that learn automotive manufacturing skills, such as design, part manufacturing, and assembly, to assist human workers. AI is also utilized in aftermarket services, such as engine or battery performance maintenance. Unsurprisingly, the automotive industry faces new intellectual property challenges including those traditionally faced by AI technology patents. What if an AI develops a method of navigation or designs a new automotive? Can such work be protected?

Both the United States Patent and Trademark Office and United States Copyright Office have consistently denied applications for intellectual property protection over AI-generated works because the AI-generated works lack “human” inventorship or authorship. However, we are seeing some recognitions of inventorship and authorship by AI in non-U.S. jurisdictions. On July 28, 2021, a patent purportedly invented by an AI (named “DABUS”) was published in South Africa’s Patent Journal. Around the same time, the Federal Court of Australia ruled that AI-generated inventions qualify for patent protection. Similar recognitions are occurring in the copyright space. For example, Canadian Intellectual Property Office registered a copyright for a painting by AI titled Suryast in December 2021. A recent consultation of the UK Intellectual Property Office concluded, that maintaining UK copyright protection over AI-generated works. 

At the consultation of the UK Intellectual Property Office, respondents who supported the removal of protection argued for lack of “originality” and potential hindrance of innovation by human creators that may result from the volume of the work generated by AI, the view of which aligns with the current U.S. copyright law and the majority of other countries throughout the world. Some proposed middle-ground of crafting a new right to protect AI-generated work by offering protection of significantly shorter duration. In the majority’s view, the current UK copyright protection over AI-generated works appears to pose no harm; despite the protection offered, only one court case involving computer (although not AI) generated work has arisen until now. Acknowledging the use of AI is still in its early stages, the UK Intellectual Property Office said, “[W]e will keep the law under review and could amend, replace or remove protection in future if the evidence supports [the change].” 

Indeed, the era of AI is yet to come, and we will see more changes in the law throughout the world as the era approaches. The direction in which these changes may occur remain in obscurity: the few currently offering protection may step back, more may join the group, or we may see a new system in compromise. Companies will need to keep an eye on these changes to adopt appropriate legal strategies and protection for their global portfolio of AI technology.

Tweets we found interesting:

Articles related to the topic:

Inventors and innovations in the era of AI — blogs.worldbank.org

Since the time of the caveman, every technological discovery has been made by a human being: the digging stick, the scraper, the wheel, the car, penicillin. For many years, nobody challenged a worldwide legal approach that only a human being can be an inventor.

Recognizing Artificial Intelligence (AI) as Authors and Inventors Under U.S. Intellectual Property Law | Richmond Journal of Law and Technology — jolt.richmond.edu

Pearlman Publication Version PDF Cite as: Russ Pearlman, Recognizing Artificial Intelligence (AI) as Authors and Inventors Under U.S. Intellectual Property Law, 24 Rich. J. L. & Tech. no. 2, 20…

The Artificial Inventor Project — www.wipo.int

Is an inventor always human? In a world in which artificial intelligence is playing an ever-expanding role, including in the processes of innovation and creativity, Professor Ryan Abbott considers some of the challenges that AI is posing for the patent system.